Reply #20: You are reaching.

[TruthIsAll]

Your valid issues from the other day have degenerated into circular arguments. I do not question their methodology. No one does. I question the results.

The Preliminary Exit Poll was pristine. I do not question that.

I question the change from 41 to 43% in the Final. We agree it is impossible, yet they had to force a match to the recorded vote.

But as uscountvotes.org has stated, Mitofsky-Edison has never considered the possibility that the vote count was fraudulent, only that Bush Voters were more reluctant to speak to exit pollsters. That has been disproved.

My analysis speaks for itself. No amount of spin on your part can cloud the FACTS. The only question is your definition of proof as compared to mine.

Proof beyond a reasonable doubt (99%) is not required in a civil case. You only need to believe in the preponderance of evidence (50%). Here probabilities are MUCH LOWER than 1 in a million.

Have you reached a verdict?
We have, your honor.