You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #38: Does someone else remember this: shortly after Nov 2 one of the blog [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
38. Does someone else remember this: shortly after Nov 2 one of the blog
reporters (i.e., one of the people posting or cited in major blogs regularly and accorded trust for their accuracy) posted a report of a face-to-face encounter with Teresa and John Kerry. I remember the description but I did not save it and do not have a link to it. I also don't recall which of the major blog personalities it was -- it may have been in Will Pitt's blog, but I am by no means sure of that; at that time I was monitoring a lot of blogs.

What he reported was that he talked about the evidence pouring in that the vote in Ohio and elsewhere was subject to election fraud on a large scale. He went through some of the particulars and said more information was coming in all the time. He was saying that the election might have been stolen. What I particularly recall is his description of the reactions of Theresa and John to this monolog. Theresa, he said, reacted with obvious anger and strong concern. John, on the other hand, had a different response. I recall the blogger saying "His eyes sort of glazed over," and going on to say that it was clear that John thought he was spinning groundless conspiracy theories. He showed no interest at all and seemed turned off by the blogger's report.

At the time I read this in the first few weeks after the election, I was concerned but hoped that maybe John was just being cagey and knew much more than he was letting on. But now I think it likely that he really did doubt that there was enough election fraud to change the outcome. He did concede very quickly, while the election watchers were still en route to report on the widespread fraud evidence they observed.

Does anyone else remember this report? It's driving me nuts to have forgotten who this was. In retrospect, what he saw and reported seems rather prescient.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC