You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #6: Why compare with "contaminated" 1996 CNN and 2000 MSNBC final data? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
kiwi_expat Donating Member (526 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Why compare with "contaminated" 1996 CNN and 2000 MSNBC final data?
In your other thread you appear to agree that the 1996 CNN and 2000 MSNBC poll results have been "manipulated to match the votes".

"That's why the Dems always win the exit polls and lose the votes.
And why the final exit polls look so good - because they're manipulated to match the votes.
Even Mitofsky admits it.
He claims it's SOP."]

So why should we be impressed if the 2004 Washington Post data's PARTY ID. WEIGHTS match those in the manipulated("contaminated") 1996 CNN and 2000 MSNBC final exit poll data?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC