You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: We need to compare raw data with raw data. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
kiwi_expat Donating Member (526 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-05 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. We need to compare raw data with raw data.
As I said in my post on your Feb-21 8:29am thread, your 1996 CNN and 2000 MSNBC data do not appear to be RAW data.

(Teixeira claims that his 1996 and 2000 exit poll data is actual raw data. See http://www.tcf.org/publications/pow/nov17_2004.pdf )

The discrepancy between the 2004 WP data and the 2004 CNN data is obviously due to the 2004 CNN data being less "raw" (more "weighted").

I believe that election fraud occurred, big time. I'm still not convinced that the raw exit poll data proves it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC