You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #141: Sorry for missing the obvious.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
kiwi_expat Donating Member (526 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #110
141. Sorry for missing the obvious....
Edited on Fri Mar-25-05 12:17 AM by kiwi_expat
Precinct sample-adj weight should probably be = precinct WGT/sample!

Would anyone ;-)like to do a spreadsheet for Ohio precincts, showing:

"raw Kerry" x WGT/sample, "raw Bush" x WGT/sample, and their spread;
"wgtd Kerry", "wgtd Bush", and their spread;
and the net (signed difference) of the spreads?

Thanks in advance!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC