You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #3: Glad someone else is also looking at this. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Glad someone else is also looking at this.
Edited on Fri Feb-18-05 03:49 PM by skids
Have all the data downloaded, and an idea for an analysis, but haven't got to it yet.

Look at the weights. They show you who our so-called "non-responders" were supposedly. People with high weights are the ones that Mitofski claims did not respond, or who were under-represented to begin with in the precinct sampling.

Working with party ID and turnout is a bit dicey. It doesn't prove much, since the numbers change a lot over 4 years.

Oh, and people who voted in Ohio and saw an exit poller, please drop a note here and tell us the county/polling place where you voted...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC