You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #69: Let's see - [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
qwghlmian Donating Member (768 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-05 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. Let's see -
Edited on Sun Jan-30-05 11:07 PM by qwghlmian
http://www.votecobb.org/recount/ohio_reports/counties/lucas.php

was rejected by the optical scanner several times. We were told that the reason for this was that it was counted as an over-vote. The election officials determined that the intent of the voter was to vote for Bush. A white sticker was placed over the pencil mark next to Kerry's name. With this modification, the optical scanner did not reject the ballot.

http://www.votecobb.org/recount/ohio_reports/counties/washington.php

The first 3 ballots we saw in Aurelius precinct had the oval for write in candidate filled and without a candidate name written AND the oval for Bush filled in. The write in oval on each one had a white oval sticker covering the mark so that they were counted for Bush rather than as overvotes. The 4th ballot had an "x" on the Bush oval which had been marked over to make it show up.

I objected to the altering of ballots and we were told that this was the policy of the board to correct the ballots so that they would count correctly in the machine.

There was one I particularly objected to in Belpre 4A. The voter both marked the oval and put an X through it for Peroutka and marked the oval for Bush. They put a band-aid over the Peroutka vote and put their own X on the Bush vote. I said the ballot should definitely be an overvote. (Side note — the Republican observer actually leaned over from her social conversation, looked at the ballot and said "I agree" to me). All members of the BOE agreed the vote should count for Bush.

The last counted were absentee ballots and they were kicking out and being re-marked faster than I could even count. I DID watch every re-mark.

At one point Bill and I viewed the official Remarked ballots which seemed to only be done if there was no way to make it go through the machine after working on it with a marker or band-aid OR if they were torn. There were not many. Of note, Bill requested to see the remade ballot for the top one which was in Wesley precinct. The BOE was unable to find it.

---------------------

On edit: I am pretty sure as I was reading recount reports I have seen more mentions of such stickers, just don't feel like looking for more, since that site does not have a search feature.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC