You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: We should have both [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
3 DanO Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-05 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. We should have both
The counties need to conduct random audits to look for unexpected problems, to measure the accuracy of the voting process and as a deterrent to fraud. The challenge audits should be provided to any candidate or voter group willing to pay for the audit (refunded if the audit shows a significant discrepancy). Whenever a major change is made to the voting procedures or equipment the audits should be expanded.

ALL results should be posted. Including the individual precinct tallies and the results of every count at every level. The election results should not be final until all recounts audits and challenges have been completed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC