You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #74: The 'official' explanation (one of) is that the early polls [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-04 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #43
74. The 'official' explanation (one of) is that the early polls
were 'raw' -- not adjusted for the fact that the polls were stratified (poll locations were chosen randomly, but voters who vote at that poll are a non-random sample) -- and the later polls were correctly adjusted.

The reasons the 'official' explanation blows chunks is that (1) the polls were reported for critical categories (male/female; white/non-white) separately and (2) the data reported in the media was not 'raw' -- it had already been adjusted and was ready for public consumption.

The 'massaging' was mixing in the fraudulent tabulated votes with the exit poll data.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC