Reply #23: He isn't discounting anything

[Blue in the face]

Maybe Keith is trying to sift through the bullshit like dead dogs and affidavits and trying to cover his ass with hard facts. I know if I was in his journalistic shoes, that is what I'd be doing. I am sure that is what Kerry is doing as well.

However, I know when I asked questions of Brad about Curtis's affadavit, I got a short and not satisfactory answer of "look up the police report yourself". I doubt that KO would find that a satisfying response either and I can imagine that he has grown tired of trying to legitimize every theory that DU has offered as evidence of voter fraud, especially someone who "just realized after 4 years that Feeney and the Republicans might be up to trying to cheat the election", but has no hard evidence to back himself up.

I believe that it is possible to have come up with computer program to change votes. I believe that Curtis's affadavit does nothing to prove that point, however. And I believe that Bradblog has had it out for KO since Keith pointed out the holes in Curtis's story.

I believe that the best way to get Keith talking about what we want him to is to show him hard facts, but just like Bev Harris, Votergate and all of the other investigations that ended up being one big tease, if not fundraising tools, Clint Curtis's story does nothing to prove voter fraud and so far has been a disappointment.

Go ahead and flame away, I know it's coming: "I only have 200 posts, if I was truly behind the movement, I would have found the police report about Curtis's dead dog, I'm a Freeper", etc.

But if you guys are attacking me then maybe you will leave the hell alone the only TV journalist to seriously investigate and publicize this issue.