Reply #44: I love this series--I, II & III! KICK!!!

[Peace Patriot]

--"To believe Bush won, you have to believe..."

It's great to see it all laid out like this--the total picture of I, II & III. The impossible Exit Poll discrepancies then become one piece of evidence in a mountain of evidence that fraud was intended and fraud was accomplished.

I have often thought that if it were ONLY the Exit Polls, your average voter, viewer or reader might think, "Yeah, that's sure weird. Could be something wrong with the Exit Polls." He/she might not get to the impossible odds, which is the clincher. (Or they might well get to it--your average Joe or Jane is not that stupid, and calculates odds all the time in ordinary life, from Vegas gambling to lottery ticket wins to baseball odds to the odds of living to a ripe old age with all your faculties in tact.)

But when you COMBINE these near uniform pro-Bush discrepancies with a calculation of the odds, and look at everything that has been revealed--the odds on the touchscreen glitch almost always favoring Bush, the intense vote suppression aimed only at Democratic voters, the set-up for fraud (secret, proprietary source code, owned and controlled exclusively by big Bush donors), etc.--the current efforts in Ohio to hide evidence, and the previously stolen election, it gets to be overwhelming.

Determining Election Fraud is NOT just a scientific endeavor, and neither is it a problem that is exclusively a legal matter (can you prove "beyond a reasonable doubt"?). It is a POLITICAL matter, and one that goes to the heart of our democracy.

In this sense, it doesn't even matter who actually won. With so many out of whack numbers, and so much vote suppression, and so much NON-TRANSPARENCY, the election IS fraudulent. In fact, it is fraudulent on the non-transparency alone. Secret source code. Give me a break!