the official explanation for #1 is that the machines had to be reprogrammed to recount only the presidential race. I figure the reasoning in the law there is so that a discrepancy in the Dog Catcher race on the 3% handcount/machine match wouldn't trigger a full county handcount. It still seems stupid to me, and invites tampering. (edit: of course using this official explanation to cover removal of evidence is a reasonable explanation)
I don't think anybody's even given a BS explanation for the 'cheat sheet'...all coverage of the weirdness in Hocking seems to avoid mentioning that allegation...maybe it lacks confirmation from other BOE employees (whereas it's been acknowledged that Mystery Mike was there)?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(584 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
