Reply #48: I'm fine w/ vetting the story and if you've been following my involvement

[jamboi]

you'd know that I've advocated for that continuously. But real vetting is different from things like Dunne's article. I'd welcome research that showed parts of the story were false, but I haven't seen that yet.

Standing from a distance I could agree that it would be possible that Madsen could be a disinfo artist, however if one actually studies his stuff and has contact with him and realizes that he is putting his very life on the line (not to mention his whole career), then I can't give this argument any weight.