You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: Good find. Positive proof "adjustments" made later are wrong. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-04 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good find. Positive proof "adjustments" made later are wrong.
Edited on Tue Dec-07-04 11:31 PM by skids
Now that I know that early voting was included in the exit polls,
I can say with confidence that the "adjusted" exit polls on CNN's
site are completely impossible. Why?

Because (repeat after me)

121,333,814 * 0.43 > 50456000


(And the numbers get even more wrong when you take away all the dead Bush2000 voters.)

So the next time Mitofski says "those numbers shouldn't be used, you should use the final numbers" tell him to put that in his crack pipe and smoke it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC