Reply #12: Nice try...but here's where you are wrong

[BeFree]

"There is NO, I repeat NO, evidence that the GOP stole the 2004 election. None, zippo, nada, zero, zilch. If there was ANY evidence of this voting conspiracy, John Kerry would indeed by the first one out of the box screaming about it. If there were real evidence that Bush really stole the election, moderates and even many Republicans all over the country would turn on him in a heartbeat."

Looking back at 2000, one sees that the election was stolen, yet, do you hear the DNC, etal, the republicans, etal, talking about it? No. Well the similar happened in 2004, and the same parties, save us truth seekers, are silent again. Therefore, that part of your argument is destroyed, and the rest becomes very questionable, eh?

The basic premise of the election being stolen is based on two things:

One, the exit polling. Hell, even Fox news at 5pm, Nov. 2, was as good as calling Kerry the winner. The exit polling cannot be so easily dismissed as you attempted.

Two, the centralized nature of the machines used, four companies count 80% of the US vote, making it quite possible that the alteration on such a massive scale could have taken place.

It is hard to accept that our vote can be stolen. It is an awful thing to even think about. But if one DOES think about it, one must conclude that it very well could have happened. Then, when that same someone looks at the compiled evidence, one simply has to conclude it probably did happen on Nov. 2.

Thanks anyway.