You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Florida - Suit seeks to overturn election - 12/2 [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
dzika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 08:58 AM
Original message
Florida - Suit seeks to overturn election - 12/2
Advertisements [?]
Suit seeks to overturn election
02 Dec 2004
By Marvin G. Cortner News-Gazette Staff Writer

-snip-
The Osceola County Canvassing Board and the two newly elected
Republican county commissioners have been named in a lawsuit that
alleges voting irregularities.

Julio Cesar Diaz II, a Kissimmee resident who worked on the campaign
of Democratic County Commission candidate Michael Harford as a
political consultant and who observed canvassing board activities
for both Harford and commission candidate Peter Olivo, alleges
irregularities occurred with the way absentee and early votes were
handled by the canvassing board. Republican County Commissioners Ken
Smith and Atlee Mercer and Osceola County Judge Jon Morgan comprised
the canvassing board for the Nov. 2 election.

-snip-
Diaz alleges that the unexplained delivery of thousands of ballots
to the canvassing board late on election night after the polls
closed provides the grounds on which the election should be set
aside. After the polls closed on Election Day, the elections office
received 1,955 absentee ballots and 2,602 missed early votes. He
claims that a number of these ballots were illegal — that people
essentially voted twice — and in a sufficient number to change or
place in doubt the results of the election.

-snip-
Diaz claims that neither the Supervisor of Elections staff nor the
canvassing board provided an adequate explanation as to how the
absentee ballots and early votes were received and handled on
Election Day.

-snip-
Diaz further states in court documents that the attorney also
reported that on Nov. 2 a number of absentee ballots reviewed by the
canvassing board appeared to be voted in a “hasty manner” as most of
them did not have a vote on the constitutional amendments or for
Appellate Court judges.

http://www.oscnewsgazette.com/index.php?option=news&task=viewarticle&sid=9670





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC