You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #4: It should be emphasized [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Maraya1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. It should be emphasized
that those two districts, 4N and 4F had statistically significant total number of votes. (There was one district with 1 vote for Badnarik and one for Kerry - 50% for the third party)

But in 4F and 4N the total vote counts were 534 and 520, (not sure which one was which and I don't feel like adding them up again but it really doesn't matter). So in those precincts to have a 40% and 33% voter percentage for third party is significant.

I know you highlighted those districts but I wanted to make it clear to everyone who checks the chart. In the last district in the chart the third party got 50% of the total vote of TWO. Not statistically significant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC