You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #169: BUT THAT WOULD NOT BE A MATCH IN THE SIMULATION YOU CITE [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #164
169. BUT THAT WOULD NOT BE A MATCH IN THE SIMULATION YOU CITE
Edited on Fri Apr-08-05 10:49 AM by TruthIsAll
FROM EOMER.

YOU ARE FORCING THE RESULT IN THE SIMULATION TO MAKE IT APPEAR THAT MATCHES TO WITHIN 1 PERCENTAGE DECIMAL ARE MORE FREQUENT.

SORRY, YOU CANNOT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS.

I HAVE ALREADY POSTED PROOF TODAY THAT YOUR "MATCHES" ARE NOT REALLY
MATCHES AT ALL. YOU DOUBLE THE COUNT BY YOUR SELECTIVE USE OF THE DIFFERENCE CRITERION.

YOU CANNOT FOOL US.
YOU ONLY MAKE OUR CASE STRONGER.

YOUR SHRILL RESPONSES HAVE THE SMELL OF DESPERATION.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC