Reply #44: IAMREALITY HELP

[buzzard]

Here is a quote from over at Free Republic. Does it make any sense to you?? I asked for it to be debunked in another post but I don't think anyone has looked at it. Thank You Sandy
Quote:
This attorney that you are referring to is called Arnebeck and he is filing a law suit to overturn the election results in Ohio and give to Kerry (BWAHHHH) based on of the dumbest and funniest argument ever to be presented in a court of law.

His argument is that Ohio Supreme Court justice candidate Connaley (a Democrat) got more votes then Kerry in heavily Republican areas, thus there was a fraud. He based this idiotic argument on the fact that there is no way some lower candidate on the ballot can get more votes than the presidential candidate of his or her party. Here is how to debunk his argument in few seconds:

In the whole state of Ohio the Republican US Senator Voinovich got 580,000 votes more than President Bush, where as Kerry got 670,000 votes more than Connally the Ohio Supreme Court justice candidate.

Voinovich won most of the Ohio counties that President Bush lost. Even in the counties that both him and President Bush lost he still got more votes. For example in Cuayahoga county (Cleveland area) Voinovich got approximately 70,000 more votes than President Bush.

So if we have to apply the laughable argument of Arnebeck we should conclude there was much more fraud against President Bush than against John Kerry, and that President Bush should have won Ohio not only by 118,775 votes but by 698,775 votes!