Reply #6: Good story for a start, BUT. . .

[witchhazl]

Don't you think it's significant that the first real story AP reports, there's a built-in explanation for just "worker error," nothing else at work here-- even though of course it hurt Kerry.

This voting "irregularity," like so many, is rooted in "anomalous statistics." They're willing to acknowledge this anomaly only because they can find a relatively innocuous explanation. When similarly strange statistical patterns show up, they refuse to acknowledge them-- because the only explanation suggests fraud.
They won't go there.