You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #27: I don't think that's the point though... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU
V. Kid Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. I don't think that's the point though...
Edited on Fri Nov-18-05 12:53 AM by V. Kid can only work with people so long as they're willing to work with you. Yes, the NDP wasn't able to push the Liberals further to the left, but they didn't offer them anything to do that with so what could the NDP have done, accepted a lame offer that really didn't do anything to protect the public health care system? It would have been better to have gotten something from the Liberals, but the NDP's position is weaker now that Desjarlais left, and that Chuck Cadman is dead and Martin has dithered in calling a by-election. The BQ/Con combination outnumbers the Libs/NDP anyways, and the Indps in the house will likely side with the BQ/Cons out of spite for their former parties. Jack Layton has less pull on Martin, so yes he has to set himself up to look better in the next campaign.

Besides which, why would the voters be happy with the Liberals next election? Because they had to vote in December or January? They don't pay attention to politics often anyways, so why would they all the sudden be put out when a campaign is held during those months. I think this is a tempest in a tea pot. Will the average person say to the Liberals, yes we still think your corrupt, yes you haven't really done anything on health care etc, yes your long in the tooth, but you did promise to have an election in April so yes will vote for you? I think people think all politicians are relativley corrupt, and won't care. I think far too many people who are a bit more intuinted to politics who are liberals are obsessed with the EVIL Conservatives (and don't get me wrong I wouldn't vote for them if I was paid too), to the point of thinking that if you even say something nice about one of them your accepting their agenda. But to think thats going to be a vote determining issue is wrong imo, people tune out alot of the name calling if it isn't a substntive fear. As far as Joe and Jane Canadian is concerned they're all relativley corrupt some more then others, and Paul Martin ain't no saint. In fact most of the polls show that Canadians by a majority think he and Jean Chretien are equally to blame for the sponsership scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC