You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #2: I sent the following email [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Minnesota Donate to DU
burf Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. I sent the following email
to my State Rep, the Issac Walton League, Dennis Anderson of the Star Trib, and posted it on some hunting forums. I have yet to get an answer to the questions I raised. Here's the email:

I have heard much on the dedicated sales tax proposed for clean water, duck hunting and conservation projects in Minnesota. I have not decided on my support for this initiative.

I have a question. Just how much money is being received by the state now? If you add up the total, it's gotta be alot of money. That begs the follow up of how is this money being spent? Does your organization or anyone you know of have a comprehensive list of funds allocated vs funds spent? I would like some information on this subject. We have funding from every source from Pittman-Robertson to the hunting and fishing licenses, duck stamps, CARA funds, CRP, WRP,CCRP, timber leases, oil and mineral leases, and that's only the beginning. Then on the other side we have the NGOs. Ducks Unlimited, Pheasants Forever, Delta Waterfowl, local Rod and Gun Clubs, and thats just for starters.

It is difficult to make an informed decision on the funding proposal in question without knowledge of existing expenditures. There are seemingly hundreds of organizations and programs now and the water quality and wildlife habitat seem to be getting worse. Is it a matter of money or management?

Thanks for your time and I look forward to your reply.


I got a lot of ridicule from the hunting community, a non answer from my rep, and a suggestion that I was against clean water from Anderson.

I am against the amendment for the simple reason that dedicating the funding is a bad idea. In times of a sour economy, our state's leaders need not be hamstrung by an amendment like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Minnesota Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC