You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #24: Proposal # 3 is counter intuitive [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Michigan Donate to DU
russ1943 Donating Member (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. Proposal # 3 is counter intuitive
Reading the Grand Rapids Press today (Sunday 29th) they explain that a yes vote, if successful will ban dove hunting. A no vote allows dove hunting to continue.
It's deja vu all over again.
The folks who oppose the recently passed existing law which allows dove hunting initiated the proposal and if you agree with their effort you would have to vote yes to ban dove hunting.

If their (GR Press')explanation is correct, my prediction is most people will likely vote opposite their intent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Michigan Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC