You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #29: WHY DID IA AND NH NEED TO MOVE? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Michigan Donate to DU
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-21-09 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #28
There's nothing "specious" about my argument. You just can't think of anything to refute it. You are still unable to say what was gained by IA and NH moving up. That's why you just keep say they moved because MI and FL moved first. Two wrongs make a right, huh?

Judging by your avatar, you are simply blinded by your worship of Dean. At least I know that your opinion of Granholm is based on NOTHING other than a primary grudge because she dared not to agree with your "chosen one" (Dean).

So, go ahead and continue to pretend like there wasn't a double standard for MI/FL and IA/NH. I guess some people can easily ignore facts that are inconvenient to their opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Michigan Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC