23. My point is that she could get appointed to that seat giving her
an overwhelming advantage of keeping that seat as long as she wants.
My contention is that if she wants the seat, she should run in 2010 when New York will be holding an election for the remainder of HRC's term.
Acting on appopintments like this just discourage people who view politics as a vocation. Why bother if you are going to basically be shut out of the process. She has money and the name to win hands down.
It just smells of elitism to me.
But hey, go ahead and believe what you want about appointing dynastic names. It usually works out so very well....
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
