Reply #99: So, you opposed nominating a competent and liberal woman for the seat of Hillary Clinton.

[Mass]

Why exactly? It seems it would be a fitting replacement for another competent and liberal woman.

I am not saying she is the only one worth nominating, just that you are selling her abilities short. That she did not think she deserved being elected at 30 without qualifications because she was a Kennedy should not be held against her, but for her. She is indeed qualified, has taken interest in things outside her golden circle, and is liberal. This is definitively way superior to some people who were just elected or reelected.