You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #127: There are a few guys that I like to read that work there. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
127. There are a few guys that I like to read that work there.
If you go back and note who were the authors of all of those articles at the Washington Post in 2002 and 2003, you won't find many familiar names among those who make commentary at Politico dot com who wrote pro-war articles about WMD's in Iraq.

Take some time to see what Jim VandeHei wrote back in 2002 and 2003.
He wasn't writing pro-war articles for the Post.
He was more concerned with the Valerie Plame leak scandal during the summer of 2003.
Maybe that's why he left the Post, I'm not sure.
I think he has learned a lot about reporting since then, about how newspapers are more controlled than the sites like his on the internet.

I've been reading the Washington Post off and on ever since Bernstein and Woodward did their work 36 years ago when they broke the Watergate story wide open at the Washington Post.

Mike Allen also wrote for the Washington Post back in 2002 and 2003.
I took note of the fact that his name was also associated with many articles about the Valerie Plame incident.
He seemed to be more of a researcher than just an ordinary everyday reporter.

I'm not saying he's Clark Kent, but you never see him and Superman at the same time.

:)

It just seems to me that they wanted to have more flexibility over what they wrote than the Washington Post was willing to give them.
And they also may be trying to head off being labeled as "left-wing journalists" that just work at "the famously left-wing Washington Post", which is what the right-wingers have been saying for years about them.
Neocons and Republicans have been bashing anything they don't like that is printed by the Washington Post ever since 1972.

Of course, one source is never the end-all, be-all of getting out the truth.
The truth doesn't just fall out of the sky that way.
But, I appreciate your candor in forewarning us.

I like reading what those guys have to say, and I've seen both of them on so-called "liberal" tv shows giving interviews.

But, like the man says at the end of the ad, your mileage may vary.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC