Reply #147: lol I missed this one earlier

[grantcart]

IN the same reply you accuse me of stealing an opinion piece


and then of manipulating historical fact.


Shouldn't those be 2 different attacks I mean when you accuse someone of stealing it you are implictly stating that it is too well written for their level intelligence (which is the typical type of personal attack that you engage in), and that doesn't really harmonize with the charge of poor historical representation.


By the way the sentence:
quote
It is the most twisted typical manipulation of historical fact with issues which are totally unrelated.
unquote

is gibberish.

You have interested the word 'typical' with out referring to what it refers to. Typical of what? Historical comparison in general or my posts in particular? Of course since you are making a specific reference you must have examples of other instances that you have compared it to and will be able to cite them in your reply. How is it twisted? What fact has been taken out of context? When you say that the issues are unrelated what issues are you talking about that are not related?