You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #43: Considered [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
mrbluto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
43. Considered
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 01:06 PM by mrbluto
Have I considered I could be wrong?

Heh.

I do so as a matter of mental hygiene.

I'm the one handing you a bar of mental soap on occasion.

I think your assumption that I hadn't consider the possibility of being in error more telling about you than about me.

Is that what often happens to you? Is that your experience? You find out that you hadn't considered the possibility that you are in error?

Nevermind - I don't expect an answer Nance.

I'll point out what was the essential underlying question in my post for you and your readers:

What is so magical about votes, or millions of Americans voting a particular way?

I'll tell you: consent.

It's all about consent - not the actual considered will of the citizens - consent.

The primary system, the electoral system, and the medium in which dialog occurs in this country are so damaged and twisted that it hasn't reflected the considered opinion of it's citizens in quite some time. From gerrymandering to hanging chads it's been decades. If I take the temperatures of millions of people with a busted thermometer can I arrive at any diagnosis? No.

The electoral system is a busted thermometer.

So why does it persist? Functionless things tend to fade away. If it persists then what's it's function?

The manufacture of consent.

Not to get all Chomsky on yer ass, but that's the remaining function.

People often say "If you didn't vote then you have no right to complain about who gets elected."

It's the exact opposite. At some level voting indicates that you accept the way you get "governed". It indicates consent. Once you give consent at some level you give permission and accept responsibility for everything this government does. It's not for nothing that even repressive regimes have elections. Your vote is a permission slip, a waiver of responsibility for those weilding government power.

The system that accepts and packages those votes and then labels it "The will of the people" is doing one main thing:

Manufacturing consent.

The American electoral system manufactures consent - and little else.

Get ready to ignore this Nance: I think you're part of that process here on the web.



Remember to ignore, misconstrue, & dodge when you answer, you know: SOP, standard operating procedure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC