You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: I said it's not all the MSM. I stand by it. Of course, it's a significant [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 04:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I said it's not all the MSM. I stand by it. Of course, it's a significant
factor, but it surely ain't the only factor. Not taking corporate funding shouldn't be a big deal. Most of Obama's, Edwards' and all the others comes from indidvidual small donors. Hell, Ron Paul raised more in one day than Kucinich raised in 2 years. I don't notice him doing well in my state- and I'm in the Northeast. I'm sure he'd doing better here than in other places but my guess is he's still well under 5%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC