You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #68: That did not answer my question. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
LVZ Donating Member (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #62
68. That did not answer my question.
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 01:35 PM by LVZ
Why would a "bland" Bayh appeal more than others in "non-bland" Nevada? How would he have more impact than someone like Bill Richardson or any of other candidates?

Short answer: he wouldn't.

Even so, Bayh would be a "safe" choice so that Hillary would not be upstaged - sort of like George Bush Sr's choice of Dan Quayle (also from Indiana), albeit with more intelligence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC