You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Biden did 20 years in the wilderness for stealing a speech; Obama gets a free pass? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-29-07 10:05 PM
Original message
Biden did 20 years in the wilderness for stealing a speech; Obama gets a free pass?
Advertisements [?]
That seems a bit out of line, especially since Biden got a bit of a bum rap.

Far too many people--seemingly even Obama himself--don't think this is much of a deal. They should turn off their indignation for a minute and listen to what's going on around them. It's not just pissy partisans who are bent out of shape about this, and it's not some kind of bizarre conspiracy by a few hypocritical loudmouths distorting a minor misstep into a big stumble. It's broad-based. It's a big deal. It should be seen as such.

For someone who's made so much hay about inclusiveness, this really cuts to the bone of his public persona. Too much "politics" here and basically no "hope".

Joe Biden's a good guy; you young-uns might wonder what he's been doing all these years. Well, back when he was running for president in '88, he used a speech by UK politician Neal Kinnock. Even though he credited Kinnock when giving this stump speech, the one time he didn't got caught on tape and he was hounded out of the race as a plagiarist. He paid mightily for that, and I think he's paid his debt to society. That's an ethical lapse, but it's not a lapse of pluralism or empathy, two pillars of a decent democracy. That's what this is.

This is callous disregard for the feelings of a downtrodden group, done for political gain, offhandedly covered with the fig leaf of "inclusion" and minimized as inconsequential. The mind reels. The big question is this: if THIS doesn't matter, what does?

To not take Senator Obama to task for this in a big way is to endorse such convenience of conscience. Certain means are not justified by the ends because their very employment denies the ends by definition. Where should we draw the line? Well, I'd say way short of this kind of crap.

There's a reason why stuff like this gets so much airplay: character matters. Judgment matters. Inclusion matters.

What would be a fair course of action for him to take at this point?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC