You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: You make some well thought out points...thank you! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
JANdad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. You make some well thought out points...thank you!
Edited on Mon Jul-16-07 11:59 AM by edwardsguy
-first, we should not measure the correctness of what they did do solely on whether other courses they might have taken would have "stopped him." We shouldn't evaluate actions only based on "the ends."

I agree...then we need to let go of the IWR issue and realize that it was not the cause of the war to begin with.

-secondly, the problem we faced with the IWR and still face every bit as much today is that our "leadership class" is either a. complicit with the controlling corporations or b. so damned blind that they fail to see them as an enemy.

I do not see any of our candidates as being complicit or blind, but rather as calculating politicians. A large group of the American populace was blinded by fear at the time and there is nothing that the Congress could have done to stop this juggernaut. That I believe should have been apparent to anyone after two supreme court decisions early on: One: Awarding the election to Bush and second: Siding with Cheney on the Energy Task Force meetings. That our candidates at the time were forced to "play the game" and wait things out while letting this administration collapse under it's own weight, is quite frankly the only thing that could have been done.

the only way to "stop him", both then and now is to understand that 1. bush is transitory and that the enemy we face is not 2. we are engaged in a life and death struggle for the very survival of the republic 3. the US is being sucked try by multi-national corporations and will soon be discarded on the great empire scrapheap.

You'll get no argument from me here! I believe that it was Truman who upon leaving office warned us of the MIC and the dangers that it imposed. In John Edwards, I see someone who can salvage what is left of our country and return us to an age of serving others, rather than ourselves (read:materialism) and standing up to the Multi-Nationals. I would love to see NAFTA repealed as DK would do (or so he claims he would as one of his first acts as POTUS), but these things take time and consensus.

We have been a constitutional republic for over two-hundred years...and I believe that we will continue for a long time to come. Years from now, historians will judge Bush for what he truly is. But for now, it is our duty as citizens to look beyond one insignificant vote and seek out the candidates that can truly move the nation forward with a purpose.

edit for sp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC