You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #72: Who says anyone MUST embrace one ethnicity over another? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-10-07 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #57
72. Who says anyone MUST embrace one ethnicity over another?
Edited on Sat Feb-10-07 07:24 AM by beaconess
No one has forced Obama to identify himself in any particular way. HE has chosen to self-identify as black, just as Tiger Woods has chosen to self-identify as multi-racial. Why not just respect how HE chooses to identify himself and leave it at that?

A person of mixed race who is, by all appearances, black is certainly not off-base so identifying themselves, especially since the rest of the world will stick him into that category anyway.

In fact, most blacks in American, with few exceptions, are technically mixed-race, thanks in large part to the fact that slaveholders weren't as anti-miscegenistic as they claimed to be (at least when it came to their own proclivities). But for all intents and purposes in America, if we have enough black blood to darken our melanin, we are black - and treated as such by the rest of the country (often the same people who then complain that we call ourselves black).

I've always been amused when white people (and I'm not saying you do this) get upset when blacks characterize ourselves as black or African-American or anything else, as if it was US who invented racial classification. Since we were dragged to these shores, blacks have always been singled out - and in most cases, completely defined - by our race. We were pickaninnies, darkies, coons, colored, negro, black, nigras and worse, when all we wanted to be was just "American." But after a couple of centuries of being called everything but our name, we finally said, "OK, if we're going to be defined by our race, WE will decide what to be called." Over time, the term "African-American" became the description of choice for most (although not all) of us, used interchangeably with "black."

And lo and behold, we are now consistenly bombarded with complaints from whites who demand to know "Why do you separate yourselves like that?! You're not from AFRICA! Why not just say AMERICAN?"

I think it's pretty hilarious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC