You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #25: So you'd agree that Jim Jeffords should never have been allowed [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-20-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. So you'd agree that Jim Jeffords should never have been allowed
Edited on Sun Aug-20-06 07:28 PM by dolstein
to join the Democratic caucus. After all, he had spent his entire adult life working AGAINST the Democratic Party, whereas with Lieberman, has, at most, spend a few months. Surely you'd agree that the Democratic Party should have stood on principle and refused to admit Jeffords or, at the very least, insisted that he resign and run as a Democrat in a special election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC