Reply #108: Ah, so excercising one's constitutional rights is now "terrorism"

[MadHound]

Geez, now tell me, which board am I on?

And gee, what about that hypocrisy. Perot's third party run enables Clinton's win in '92, and Perort is cheered by the Dems. Nader exercises his Constitutional right and runs third party in '00, and he's a "terrorist" You, good sir, have gotten dizzy from all the spin.

As far as a plan goes, I suggest you go and check out the Green's website, plan is all there, in black and white. And one big attraction is that the Greens don't take any corporate cash. To me that is a huge deal, since it is corporate controlled Dems and 'Pugs that have gotten this country into the shape it is in. Yeah, I know, I know, you think it is "terrorism", or that we're "Nazis", or some crazy assed thing:eyes:

Oh, and just a little personal background for you friend. I worked on Democratic campaigns time after time, since I was a kid and McGovern was running. Hell, I even voted for Gore and Kerry, in spite of my better judgement. What have you done, other than whine and moan on anonymous chat boards? How much money have you donated? How much time have you put in? Yeah, I think I've earned the right to bitch about the direction the party is headed, especially when I've already been there, done that on the whole "change the party from within" strategy. Didn't work, so it is time to start the change from without.

But it still amazes me how much power you attribute to a candidate who pulled only 2.74% of the vote. It really is boggling how much power Nader has in your mind. Hell, apparently he has more power than the mighty Clenis, and that's saying something:eyes:

But hey, if denying reality is what gets you through these troubled times, fine. Just don't expect those of us in the reality based world to join you in your dillusions.