You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #44: If nothing has changed, then a Yes vote on IWR isn't sin qua non of... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #39
44. If nothing has changed, then a Yes vote on IWR isn't sin qua non of...
Edited on Mon Jan-31-05 09:49 AM by AP
...a shameful career.

Wayne Morse and Ernest Gruening were the only two senators dissenting. In the Senate in 1964 were the following people:

BAYH, Birch Evans
BOGGS, Thomas Hale, Sr.
BYRD, Robert Carlyle
CHURCH, Frank Forrester
DODD, Thomas Joseph
ERVIN, Samuel James, Jr.
FULBRIGHT, James William
GORE, Albert Arnold
GRUENING, Ernest
HUMPHREY, Hubert Horatio, Jr.
INOUYE, Daniel Ken
KEFAUVER, Carey Estes
KENNEDY, Edward Moore
LONG, Russell Billiu
MANSFIELD, Michael Joseph (Mike)
McCARTHY, Eugene Joseph
McGOVERN, George Stanley
MONDALE, Walter Frederick
MUSKIE, Edmund Sixtus
PROXMIRE, William
RIBICOFF, Abraham Alexander
RUSSELL, Richard Brevard, Jr.
SALINGER, Pierre Emil George
STENNIS, John Cornelius
TALMADGE, Herman Eugene

So, you tell me. Was the Tonking Gulf Resolution the defining moment of these politicians' careers? Not even McCarthy dissented, and he ran as an anti-Vietnam candidate!!!!

Humphrey, Kennedy, McCarthy, McGovern, Mondale -- how many people refused to even consider them for President when they ran because of their vote on the TGR? And if they did, would that have made sense?

As for RFK, he may have had an opening vs LBJ becaue of Vietnam, but his campaign avoided the issue of Vietnam, which is why the students didn't support him. Now, anybody who thinks RFK would have lost had he been nominated needs to think about this. And you would also need to think about the fact that we did run an anti-war candidate who did lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC