Reply #295: Should the Party avoid splitting up?

[peacetalksforall]

If yes, then that is the starting position for many discussions, including the Chair.

I think if it turns out that Rosenberg and Dean end up being tops in the run they should talk to each other (with perhaps a third) and democratically work something out.

If the Dems feel urgency in not losing years and decades of progress, they need to come together by tomorrow.

To reach the country club set and the K-Mart (if they are lucky) set, the Dems may need to join hands (by tomorrow).

I still haven't studied Rosenberg - there are some sweet and sour comments and links above. I am extremely against killing and executing.

Maybe there should be a co-chair or a tri-chair. That would really spin the spinners. They wouldn't know who to attack first.

If two or three could agree on Fresh and Restorative and non-right wing approaches with an emphasis on freedom-peace-progress and prosperity - I'd be blissful.

The trouble is that there is a little more to it all - the real foe is the entity Eisenhower warned us against and it crosses parties and omits secret sub-governments and is firmly entrenched in Tri-Laterals. Councils, and Societies.