You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #104: Because the DeLay sleaze is not redistricting. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #97
104. Because the DeLay sleaze is not redistricting.
It was using underhanded and possibly outright illegal tactics to do it. That is what Dems are calling sleazy. Gerrymandering is an accepted practice if done with in legal constraints. Using corporate money in Texas state politics is illegal. UsingHomeland Security assets to track legal citizens is sleazy and likely illegal. To compare this slimeball to legal acting Dems is outright ridiculous on your part. if you seek a change in the Constitution, say so and don't characterize dems as being as sleazy as DeLay in this instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC