Reply #15: Too bad (for them) the Independent Counsel Law expired

[Proud Liberal Dem]

and the Republicans didn't feel it necessary to renew the law (or pass a new law) after Buscho won.....er.....stole the 2000 election. *Curiously*, there were also no calls from them to investigate Buscho over any aspect of the Iraq invasion/occupation, warrantless wiretapping........you get my drift. Since Buscho has elevated the bar for impeachment so high, the same standards for impeachment should now apply to Obama, standards which will be IMPOSSIBLE for ANYBODY to prove, so the WSJ, Faux News, Glenn Beck, et. al can just keep pissing into the wind for all I care.

Also, what does Obama have to do with ACORN anyway other than the fact that he used to be a community organizer too (with actual responsibilities BTW)? Was he (now) one of the front desk operators offering *advice* to O'Keefe and Giles on how to start up a brothel of underage illegal immigrants? I guess this is another Bill Ayers-inspired "guilt-by-association" *scandal*?

This should be the clearest example I can think as to why the WH and Democrats should NEVER buy into Faux News- and Glenn Beck-hyped "investigations" or "controversies": Once Faux News, et. al get their "pound of flesh" it only makes them want to come back and get the whole thing and NO amount of throwing the objects of their attention "under the bus" and/or disassociating themselves from them is EVER going to shut Faux News, et. al up until they get what they want, which is essentially to use a string of "manufactroversies" and phony and overhyped *scandals* to overturn the results of any election that a Democrat manages to legitimately win.