You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #14: So, Kerry did not have the leadership ability even to lead his [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-21-07 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
14. So, Kerry did not have the leadership ability even to lead his
own campaign. Kerry is a good senator. He simply was not presidential material. It is natural for a presidential candidate and a vice-presidential candidate to disagree, especially if both of them started out as strong contenders for the presidency, contenders each of whom has high aspirations, each of whom is dedicated to the greater good of the country, each of whom feels he or she has a mission.

Kerry should have said what he thought during the 2004 campaign. What kind of president would he have been if he could no even lead his own campaign? How effective were his persuasion skills if he could not even persuade his own running mate to follow his lead and agree with his strategy? Since when is the vice presidential candidate blamed for the presidential candidate's apparent inability to fight his own battle. How in the world was Edwards to rebut the attacks by the Swiftboaters? How in the world could Edwards have convinced the American voters that Kerry was strong enough to protect them after 9/11? Only Kerry could have done that.

And, assuming for the sake of argument that Kerry's accusation that Edwards did not want to "come out" against the War in Iraq, wasn't Kerry as the presidential candidate the leader. If so, why wasn't he strong enough and certain enough to simply tell Edwards what the campdaign's stance would be.

Kerry chose Edwards. He did not have to. Now he does not want to take responsibility for his choice. Kerry could have made it clear from the outset that he would be the presidential candidate and that his decisions would be followed. He clearly did not do that. This article attempts to reflect negatively on Edwards, but actually reflects poorly on Kerry. Sounds like Kerry waited four years to get his revenge when he thought it would do the most harm.

Kerry could not get up the gumption or the self-confidence to clarify the Swift-Boat lies loud and clear until the present, and he waited to attack Edwards until Edwards is excelling as a presidential candidate. Kerry looks like a back-stabber. This all reflects really badly on Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC