Reply #62: I think that you misread what I posted

[Orrex]

Nowhere did I say that his goals re: NAFTA or on healthcare are bad. I addressed several key aspects of his views, his history, and his general electability, any of which make him a non-viable candidate.

When I dismiss him as a kook, that's hardly the same as saying "all of his ideas are bad." I mean, even a stopped clock...

It's simply non-representative to claim that, in rejecting Kucinich or a large majority of his views, I have somehow declared that all of his suggested policies should be rejected.

Heck, it would be great if he were in a position to help draft legislation along the lines that he's proposing. Maybe he could demonstrate some of his leadership ability and unite his colleagues in enacting single-payor healthcare or ending NAFTA.