Reply #17: It was so incoherent that it suggests how dangerous Feingold is to them

[alcibiades_mystery]

Spector's point seemed to be that Feingold couldn't say definitively that Bush had broken the law, because under some weirdo interpretation (the Bushie's own, naturally), Article II invalidates any constraints that Congress may put on the action of the Executive. Needless to say, this reasoning is fascist to its core, so much so that even Spector soon started backtracking and hemming and hawing, yielding his absolutely nonsensical speech.