You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #14: That's why I never discounted the "hologram/cloaking" theories [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
killtown Donating Member (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. That's why I never discounted the "hologram/cloaking" theories
because they sure would explain a lot of things such as:

1) Pentagon witnesses who said the plane hit the lawn first.

2) Pentagon witnesses who said it looked like the plane "enveloped" into the building and were shocked the plane didn't seem to cause much of an explosion.

3) Flight 175 seeming to disappear into the WTC 2 like planes do in Flight Simulator.

4) The video of Flight 175 that seems to show the plane suddenly appear out of sky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC