You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

The Cessna Incident - too simple or too much a key problem ? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
medienanalyse Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 02:01 AM
Original message
The Cessna Incident - too simple or too much a key problem ?
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Thu May-12-05 02:24 AM by medienanalyse
A Cessna pilot was heading towards the no-fly- zone of Washington. Fighter jets scrambled and forced the Cessna to land.

So what ?

I wonder why nobody here in the last 12 hours reacted on that. What we could witness was the normal functioning of the standard operational procedures. Which did NOT work on 9/11.

So the Cessna incident is the proof of

a) Andrews Airforce base is the base in charge of the security of Washington. It has F-16 in QRA-status, that is that at least two jets are on quick reaction alert - besides of the two squadrons of fighters for normal work. Air policing is not done by Otis or Langley - as I have proved in . It is Andrews, it was Andrews, and it will be ANdrews.

b) SOPs work. Alarm at 11:59, mission accomplished at 12:14. QRA and flight times and RADAR and CIMIC (at least 30 FAA ATCs working on Andrews !) were fully operational. This is no secret. That means: hundreds and thousands of pilots and workers and family members and politicians and Washington citizens KNOW that Andrews AFB "failed" on 9/11 - and they do not speak out. In Germany it was millions who saw how Jews and Kommunists, Social democrats and Gypsis, homosexuals and Christians "vanished" in concentration camps. They saw the train waggons, they saw the prisoners in rows, they knew and stayed silent.

c) All this did not "work" on 9/11. The media did not ask why. There is no discussion. Although this is the key question:


The role of the media, the role and responsibility of anybody in public position is no issue here in this forum and not in the public of our countries.

d) I notice - again and again - that most of the DU ers are NOT interested in this question. They prefer to follow conspiracy theories and so-called "material problems" as melting steel, hidden pixels, fake planes or so. If I were responsible for opening the airspace on 9/11 I would be gratefull fo such assistance in diverting the public interest. So I must not fire any of my co-key holders. i.e.

Sleep on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC