You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #239: Well, Ma'am [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-27-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #231
239. Well, Ma'am
Edited on Thu Jan-27-05 08:54 PM by The Magistrate
It is in the main a pretty foolish piece. Its author is devoted to several untrue beliefs, but they mostly have no relevance to the thrust of discussion here, and so are not worth engaging. He does not have a very good grasp of the laws of war, in particular, or much understanding of what moves people to kill and die in war, but these things are common to people who blankly abhor the whole exercise. Devil's advocacy is best avoided by those who think themselves angels at heart, they cannot avoid striking false notes in that key.

The Pentagon was certainly a legitimate target; there is hardly any more legitimate a military target than the highest headquarters of a military force. The means of striking at the Pentagon, however, would probably be judged criminal, as it involved a large number civilians, and it was probably not necessary to do so. The Trade Center buildings were not a military target, and there is no possible construction that can be placed on that attack that would render it other than a criminal deed. It does not matter to the laws of war that some of the civilians at that premesis may have profitted from exploitation, even exploitation unto death, of some other people: wrecking that place, and killing those people, could have no direct military value, and that is the criterion.

To the degree that the author is in sympathy with the idea that the United States and its people deserve some punishment, he must unavoidably be seen as in sympathy to exactly that degree with the people who carried these actions, that he views as a species of collective punishment against the economic and military elite of the country. He can hardly be surprised by the storm of obloquey called down on his head by this piece, but likely intended to provoke it, and rather enjoys the storm and noteriety it brings. Nor can he sustain any pretense that his mind set is really much different than that of members of the economic and military elite he is so incensed with: he merely takes another side, but would prosecute its aims in precisely the same style as they work to achieve their's.

"Revolution, n.: An abrupt change in the form of mis-government."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC