You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #130: I just said I was reading it [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #129
130. I just said I was reading it
I am 1% into it according to Kindle. It is at "Of one thing I'm certain. The commission's conclusions have held up remarkably well against all assaults on their validity". Look, I know you feel the need to join in with the dude and try to discredit me because I am not as well informed about the assassination of JFK as you guys are, but I honestly think there is more to it than what the Warren Commission came up with 46 years ago and that's all I ask.

There is no need to rag on people because they ask questions. The fact that you are reading Bugliosi's book means that you are still looking into it even if it is as someone who believes the official story and wants to back up their beliefs with the facts they seem worthwhile.

I'm not a stupid person. I know that there are people that will disagree with things I think about. But the fact that this forum just keeps going on and on with the for and against is ridiculous. There is nothing wrong with disagreeing, but there is no need to call each other idiots for not believing in the truths each of us disagree on.

I bet you guys (the ones who disagree with me on the JFK crap) are great guys and we could probably hang out and have a great time as long as we don't discuss this crap, but I know that in the arena of an open forum it can be easy to disagree and get nasty so it is what it is.

I'm not a bad person, I am just someone who has questioned the findings of the Warren Commission and I am one of the 75 plus % that has. Hell, I could be completely wrong, but it is worth the discussion I think.

The truth is, sometimes I think Oswald was completely responsible for shooting the president of the US and then I read something else that changes that belief. And then I read something else that supports it and so on and so on. There's no need to get mean towards each other. Explain why you think what you think and I can do the same and that's it man. It's not that hard to get along

Ok, anyone reading this probably thinks I'm an idiot by now, but we had a recording session here at my studio and they brought me
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC