You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #181: Speaking of veering... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
procopia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #180
181. Speaking of veering...
You accused me of taking NIST's statement out of context to change its meaning. I provided the context to show the statement meant exactly what it says:

"...we are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse."

Now you want to change course and argue whether the NIST report addressed the collapse after initiation. It did, but it was very limited and not useful or supported "by the laws of physics, logic, history, data, calculations, science of any kind, computer models, or physical models."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC