You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #164: So you don't accept NoSheep's argument that [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-09-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #163
164. So you don't accept NoSheep's argument that
Rupert Murdoch's ownership of Fox means it's perfectly plausible that NatGeo helped covered up the deaths of their coworkers and kids in their care? If you'd simply repudiate such a despicable argument, I'd be happy to retract the statement. However, your egging him on seemed to imply that you did accept his argument.

Waiting on you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC