Reply #8: Contradiction remains

[John Doe II]

K-robjoe: I agree that certainly my argument about Glick's phone call is much stronger as I think is irrefutable and only based on facts. This time I don't want to show that the Commission lied about the timeline but I question the end of the flight (and there are more contradictions still to come).
First in any case we can agree that given what happens when the hijackers planed to crash the flight it was impossible to continue the counterattack. And certainly one can distinguish the sound of a counterattack and people sreaming of pain. So on the first glance the Commission Report seems to be coherent but I think it can't be true.
Is this just about semantics? Does it matter if the Commission called it counterattack or people screaming of pain?
Yes, it does. Because the Report hides a strange absence. The absence of a certain noise that is suspiciously absent of the recording as well that family members heard: The famaily members don't mentioned the screams of people that are in pain but moreover no screams of people that know that the plane will crash within seconds? How come they don't here anything that indicates that people in the cockpit and elsewhere see and know there are dying within the next seconds?? And very strange as well on the recording there is something else missing: "There is no sound of the impact".
http://www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/4084323.htm?1c

In this light I think the probability that it happened to Flight 93 what the Commission reported are very very low.